A Should question

Should I choose an SEO company with content writers?

3 min read Cites 1 source

Choose one whose writing you can check, whether its writers are employees or freelancers. Google’s guidance on content is about what gets published and about making clear who created it, not about how the writers are employed. Writers on staff can help, because they work closely with the people planning the content, but they guarantee nothing on their own. The deciding questions are who writes and reviews each piece, whose name it carries, and whether that name is true.

What Google asks about authorship

Google’s guidance on creating helpful, reliable, people-first content suggests judging content by “Who, How, and Why”. On the first of these it asks: “Is it self-evident to your visitors who authored your content?” The same section draws a hard line on invented authors: “Fabricating creator profiles (such as by using AI-generated headshots, made-up names, or false credentials to make content appear as if it was written by human experts) is a form of deception.”

That turns the staffing question into a more useful one. Ask whose name will appear on the content written for you, whether that person exists, and whether they wrote or reviewed the piece. A company that offers expert bylines should be able to name the expert and show their credentials. If it cannot, the byline is a risk to your site, not an asset.

What in-house writers add

Writers who sit with the strategists see the research, the plan, and the client’s goals without a long handoff, and over time they can learn a client’s subject and voice. When a page underperforms, one team owns both the brief and the writing. Those are real advantages, but they depend on how the team works. A company can employ writers and still publish thin, repetitive pages if its process rewards volume over substance.

When outside writers are a sound choice

Freelance writers or specialist partners can produce strong work when three things are in place: a written editorial standard, a reviewer who is not the writer, and a named person accountable for accuracy. For specialized fields such as law, medicine, or finance, a specialist writer or reviewer with relevant qualifications can matter more than any in-house generalist. Ask how the company finds and vets outside writers, and who checks their work before it reaches your site.

Testing the writing before you sign

Read published samples as a skeptical reader would: is each piece specific and accurate, or padded and vague, and does it answer the question a searcher would have? Ask who wrote each sample and who edited it, how facts are checked, and how the company brings in subject knowledge for a field it has not covered before. Then ask for one sample in your own field or a close one. The quality of that sample and the process behind it should decide the choice; whether the writers sit inside the company is a secondary detail.